¶1(dissenting) — The wrong here committed, if any, was an “unjust usurpation of the wife’s natural *508right,” and in my opinion she may maintain an action therefor in her individual name under Rem. & Bal. Code, § 5926 (P. C. 95 § 5).
76 Wash. 504
Schneider v. Biberger
Decided December 3, 1913
Washington Supreme Court · decided 1913-12-03
<p>Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Chehalis county, Sheets, J., entered January 2, 1913, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action in tort.</p>
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Reversed · Decided 1913-12-03
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently May 1984
2 district · 14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →