Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 76 Wash. App. 116 - State v. Lozano

76 Wash. App. 116 - State v. Lozano’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 2001
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Oregon v. Elstad · Fare v. Michael C. · 119 Wash. 2d 192 - State v. Salinas · United States v. Check

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Failure to administer Miranda warnings creates a presumption of compulsion. Consequently, unwarned statements that are otherwise voluntary within the meaning of the Fifth Amendment must nevertheless be excluded from evidence under Miranda.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.