76 Wash. App. 129 - State v. Amo’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 2005
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 117 Wash. 2d 156 - State v. Allert · 120 Wash. 2d 913 - State v. Hutsell · 122 Wash. 2d 502 - State v. Gaines · 115 Wash. 2d 350 - State v. Estrella · State v. Gardner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The fact that [the defendant] ... is needed by her children does not in any way distinguish her possession and delivery of cocaine.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Law“does not make the commission of her three crimes any less offensive”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Law
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.