Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 76 Wash. App. 863 - Beard v. King County

76 Wash. App. 863 - Beard v. King County’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
July 2015
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently July 2015 · most notably 87 Wash. App. 468 - Phillips v. King County (1997), Winbun v. Moore (2001)

1 federal appellate · 26 state decisions

150199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 114 Wash. 2d 271 - Marincovich v. Tarabochia · 123 Wash. 2d 15 - Adcox v. Children's Orthopedic Hospital & Medical Center · 118 Wash. 2d 753 - Allen v. State · 75 Wash. 2d 660 - Ruth v. Dight · 118 Wash. 2d 737 - Hibbard v. Gordon, Thomas, Honeywell, Malanca & O'Hern

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] smoking gun is not necessary to commence the limitation period.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The discovery rule provides that a cause of action does not accrue until an injured party knows, or in the exercise of due diligence should have discovered, the factual bases of the cause of action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “unconscionable result of barring an aggrieved party's right to recovery before a right to judicial relief even arises.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.