76 Wis. 2d 361 - Anderson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
36 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently June 2007 · most notably 93 Wis. 2d 278 - Elias v. State (1980), 118 Wis. 2d 339 - State v. Wickstrom (1984)
36 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 49 Wis. 2d 263 - McCleary v. State · 39 Wis. 2d 754 - State v. Hutnik · 70 Wis. 2d 179 - Ocanas v. State · 70 Wis. 2d 280 - Rosado v. State · 44 Wis. 2d 454 - Cheney v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... weight which is to be attributed to each factor is a determination which appears to be particularly within the wide discretion of the sentencing judge.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“A past record of criminal offenses; a history of undesirable behavior patterns; the defendant's personality, character and social traits; the results of a presentence investigation; the vicious or aggravated nature of the crime; the degree of the defendant's culpability; the defendant's demeanor at trial; the defendant's age, educational background and employment record; the defendant's remorse, repentance and cooperativeness; the defendant's need for close rehabilitative control . . . the rights of the public . . . [and] the length of pretrial detention.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[I]mposition of a particular sentence can be based on any one or more of the three primary factors. While an element of weighing or balancing is involved, this is for the trial court to perform. Such determination will not be reweighed or rebalanced by this court, since "... weight which is to be attributed to each factor is a determination which appears to be particularly within the wide discretion of the sentencing judge."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.