76 Wis. 2d 387 - State v. Monahan’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 46 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently April 2020 · most notably State v. Eason (2001), State v. Reagan (1988)
6 federal appellate · 46 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · North Carolina v. Pearce · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Jones v. United States · Chambers v. Maroney
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“examining Hills' premises with a view to the discovery of contraband or evidence of guilt. In looking into the living room the agent was prying into hidden places for that which is concealed. We conclude that the entry into the kitchen and the visual surveillance of the living room was a search. Id. at 395 , 251 N.W.2d at 423. The state argues that Monahan is distinguishable because: (1) unlike Hills, Altenburg never specifically told Gosh not to enter the living room, and thus Gosh had ' 'no reason to believe [he] was not welcome to follow Altenburg [then]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“There was no statement that the agents were not to enter the kitchen. Did this mean they were entitled to enter the kitchen without invitation from Hills or in his absence? We do not believe so. The conduct of Hills demonstrates that the agents were to remain in the den. He specifically directed them to this room. He gave no indication that [they] were entitled to roam at will, on the contrary he stated they were not to go into the living room. Monahan, 76 Wis. 2d at 394 , 251 N.W.2d at 423 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“. . . that there are recognized distinctions in the appropriate levels of protection afforded by the Fourth Amendment to different forms of intrusion. Wendricks v. State, 72 Wis. 2d 717, 722 , 242 N.W.2d 187, 190 (1976). The highest level of protection is afforded to a dwelling place. See: State v. Pires, 55 Wis.2d 597, 604 , 201 N.W.2d 153, 157 (1972).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.