76 Wis. 2d 482 - State v. Manson’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

cited by 11 later decisions

states following

February 1998

most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently February 1998

11 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Idaho Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v. Wirtz · 31 Wis. 2d 110 - Lock v. State · 24 Wis. 2d 527 - State v. Nutley · 75 Wis. 2d 411 - State v. Asfoor · 60 Wis. 2d 683 - State v. Cydzik

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“conduct imminently dangerous to another and evincing a depraved mind, regardless of human life.” Sec. 941.30, Stats. The evidence was undisputed that the defendant turned on his headlights and swerved to avoid the squad car on the one- way street, and that he sounded his horn and braked in an attempt to avoid colliding with the other vehicle. In light of these facts, the court held that the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. 147 Wis. 2d 429 - State v. Spears
“# “(1) undertakes conduct (either verbal or overt action) which as a matter of objective fact aids another person in the execution of a crime, and further (2) he consciously desires or intends that his conduct will yield such assistance.” State v. Manson, 76 Wis.2d 482, 486 , 251 N.W.2d 788 (1977), quoting State v. Asfoor, 75 Wis.2d 411, 427 , 249 N.W.2d 529 (1977).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. 84 Wis. 2d 272 - Krueger v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.