Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 76 Wyo. 445 - Arnold v. State

Arnold v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
6
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

46 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably State v. Alexander (1958), Weaver v. Mitchell (1986)

46 state decisions

1001957196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Goddard v. Ordway · Gleckman v. United States · Grover Irrigation & Land Co. v. Lovella Ditch, Reservoir & Irrigation Co. · 160 Pa. Super. 165 - Commonwealth v. Blose · State v. Faulkner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In all cases of misdemeanors tried before justices of the peace, or the district courts of this state, by indictment or information, in which the defendant may be convicted, the punishment shall be within the discretion of the court, limited as penalties now are by law, except that payment of the costs of prosecution may be added to and made a part of the sentence, * * * ””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Johnson v. State · Seaton v. State
  2. “... The right to trial by jury in criminal prosecutions is inviolate and may not be hampered either directly or indirectly...”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. State ex rel. Weber v. Municipal Court of the Town of Jackson · State Ex Rel. Weber v. MUNICIPAL COURT, ETC.
  3. “amounts to coercion and infringes a constitutional safeguard.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. 943 So. 2d 559 - State v. Rideau

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.