Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 760 A.2d 27 - Com. v. JHB

Com. v. JHB’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
November 2022
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently November 2022

1 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

100200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Fisher · 421 Pa. Super. 12 - Grove North America, Division of Kidde Industries, Inc. v. Arrow Lift & Construction Equipment Co. · 432 Pa. Super. 586 - In the Interest of K.B. · In the Interest of B.P.Y. · Mansfield's Case

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) General Rule. — If the child is found to be a delinquent child the court may make any of the following orders of disposition determined to be consistent with the protection of the public interest and best suited to the child’s treatment. ... (5) Ordering payment by the child of reasonable amounts of money as fines, costs or restitution as deemed appropriate as part of the plan of rehabilitation considering the nature of the acts committed and the earning capacity of the child....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “in the case of . . . a dependent child where the jurisdiction of the court is permitted under paragraph (6) of the definition of `dependent child' in section 6302 ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “encompasses the entire statutory scope of authority and discretion of the juvenile court to exercise jurisdiction over children as defined by the act.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.