Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 760 F.2d 1009 - Wiggins v. Rushen

Wiggins v. Rushen’s Empirical Analysis

760 F.2d 1009 · 1985

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
October 2021
most recently cited

26 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently October 2021 · most notably Sample v. Johnson (1985), Dilley v. Gunn (1995)

26 federal appellate · 3 district ·

22019851990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Roe v. Wade · City of Los Angeles v. Lyons · Sibron v. State of New York Peters · Carey v. Piphus · Powell v. McCormack

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “capable of repetition but evading review”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) the challenged action is of limited duration, too short to be fully litigated prior to its cessation or expiration; and (2) there is a reasonable expectation that the same complaining party will be subjected to the same action again.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he possibility that he will be convicted [of pending charges] and again sent to the maximum security unit at Soledad is too speculative to rise to the level of reasonable expectation or demonstrated possibility”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.