Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 760 F.2d 102 - Smith v. Rose

Smith v. Rose’s Empirical Analysis

760 F.2d 102 · 1985

Citation profile

66
cited by 66 later decisions
January 2012
most recently cited

47 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently January 2012 · most notably Chapman v. City of Detroit (1986), Hahn v. Star Bank (1999)

47 federal appellate ·

3601985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Haines v. Kerner · Wolff v. McDonnell · Bell v. Wolfish · Parratt v. Taylor · Monroe v. Pape

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A pleading will not be sufficient to state a cause of action under the Civil Rights Act if its allegations are but conclusions.”); Borenstein v. City of Philadelphia, 595 F.Supp. 853, 856 (E.D.Pa.1984) (”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.