Cherry v. Heckler’s Empirical Analysis
760 F.2d 1186 · 1985
Citation profile
31 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 89 later decisions — most recently April 2018 · most notably Ingram v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration (2007), Thomas v. Sullivan (1991)
31 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2412 · 42 U.S.C. § 1381 (§ 1601 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 401 (§ 201 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Bonner v. City of Prichard · Califano v. Sanders · Weinberger v. Salfi · Stein v. Reynolds Securities, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 89 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“reconsideration on the merits to any extent”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Graham v. Bowen · Hall v. Bowen“only an opportunity to be heard 'at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the judicial determination whether remand is necessary is a de novo proceeding.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Caulder v. Bowen · Smith v. Bowen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.