Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

760 F.2d 126

Docket No. 83-1228.

Donovan v. Brandel

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided April 30, 1985.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1985-04-30

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently April 1988

1 federal appellate ·

Relies on Donovan v. Brandel · Simmons v. Interstate Commerce Commission

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1985-04-30

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Before KENNEDY and JONES, Circuit Judges, and CHURCHILL, District Judge.*

¶3ORDER

¶4The Court not having favored rehearing en banc in this case, the petition for rehearing is referred to our panel for disposition.

¶5The petition for hearing states that the appeal involves the following issue:

Whether a panel of this Court erred in holding that migrant farm workers’ children under 12 years of age were not employees of the farm owner when they harvested his pickle crop, so that the children were denied the protection of the Fair Labor Standards Act’s prohibition against oppressive child labor.

¶6This issue involving the relationship between the appellee and children under 12 years of age if the parent is an independent contractor was never raised nor considered by the trial court nor by the panel, [736 F.2d 1114 (6 Cir.1984) ], and it is in appropriate for consideration at this stage of the appeal.

¶7Upon consideration, IT IS ORDERED that the petition for rehearing be and hereby is denied. The Court’s decision is without prejudice to such new issue.

¶8Judge Jones would grant rehearing on the issue of whether the pickle pickers are “employees” of Brandel Farms for the purposes of the FLSA.

/760/f2d/126 · .json · Public domain