Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

760 F.2d 244

Docket No. 83-5764.

Johnson v. United States

Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided April 24, 1985.

Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1985-04-24

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 1995

3 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Johnson v. United States · Smith v. Office of Personnel Management · Johnson v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1985-04-24

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Podhurst, Orseck, Parks, Josefsberg, Eaton, Meadow & Olin, P.A., Joel D. Eaton, Miami, Fla., for plaintiffs-appellants.

¶2Jeffrey D. Fisher, Spec. Asst. U.S. Atty., Linda Collins-Hertz, Jonathan Goodman, Asst. U.S. Attys., Miami, Fla., Robert S. Greenspan, U.S. Dept, of Justice, Nicholas Stephen Zeppos, Washington, D.C., for defendant-appellee .

¶3(Opinion January 10, 1985, 11th Cir., 1985, 749 F.2d 1530)

¶4Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, RONEY, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HENDERSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

¶5BY THE COURT:

¶6A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

¶7IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by this court en banc without oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs. The order denying rehearing and rehearing en banc entered on March 26, 1985, 758 F.2d 660, and the prior panel’s opinion are hereby VACATED.

/760/f2d/244 · .json · Public domain