Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 760 F.2d 369 - Gray v. Heckler

Gray v. Heckler’s Empirical Analysis

760 F.2d 369 · 1985

Citation profile

190
cited by 190 later decisions
May 2022
most recently cited

36 federal appellate · 140 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 190 later decisions — most recently May 2022 · most notably 16272a Santiago v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (1991), Joseph T. FRUSTAGLIA, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant, Appellee (1987)

36 federal appellate · 140 district ·

92019851990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rodriguez v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · Goodermote v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · Elizabeth Deloatche v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human Services of the United States · Carter v. Heckler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 190 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““may rely on general job categories in the Supplement to the Dictionary of Occupational Titles [.DOT] as presumptively applicable to a claimant’s prior work.... [T]he claimant could overcome the presumption that the Secretary’s generalization applies by demonstrating that her duties were not those envisioned by the framers of the categories listed in the publication.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “It is well settled that a claimant seeking disability benefits has the initial burden of proving that her impairments prevent her from performing her former type of work.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[S]ubjective symptoms must be evaluated with due consideration for credibility, motivation and medical evidence of impairment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.