United States v. Chitty’s Empirical Analysis
760 F.2d 425 · 1985
Citation profile
12 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently May 2013
12 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 2314 · 18 U.S.C. § 4244
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Agurs · Giglio v. United States · Napue v. People of the State of Illinois
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[E]ach interstate or foreign transportation of stolen [goods] constitutes a separate violation of Sec. 2314, even if the various acts of transportation are part of a single scheme.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.