Tandy Brands, Inc. v. Harper’s Empirical Analysis
760 F.2d 648 · 1985
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently March 2003
8 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Weatherford Oil Tool Company v. Campbell · Delancey v. Motichek Towing Service, Inc. · J. C. Motor Lines, Inc. v. Trailways Bus System, Inc. · Matlock v. Data Processing Security, Inc. · Frankiewicz v. National Comp Associates
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“not satisfy Rule 51's requirement that a party state 'distinctly the matter to which he objects and the grounds of his objection'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“'sufficiently specific to bring into focus the precise nature of the alleged error'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.