Gorham v. Franzen’s Empirical Analysis
760 F.2d 786 · 1985
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently November 2012 · most notably Perri v. Director, Department of Corrections of Illinois (1987), United States v. Hawkins (1987)
18 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chapman v. State of California · Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Johnson v. Zerbst
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The question of whether a defendant has waived his Miranda rights is one of fact, and a trial judge's findings of fact regarding a defendant's waiver will not be overturned unless clearly erroneous.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“His failure to invoke clearly those rights, which he knew and understood, amounted to a waiver of his right to remain silent under the fifth amendment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“in light of the record viewed in its entirety.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.