Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 760 F.3d 10 - Payne v. Stansberry

Payne v. Stansberry’s Empirical Analysis

760 F.3d 10 · 2014

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
April 2024
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 9 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · United States v. Olano · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Cuyler v. Sullivan · Neder v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[A]bsent a strategic decision by counsel, the ineffectiveness prong of Strickland turns on whether an objectively reasonable attorney would have [sought a continuance] because the issue had a reasonable likelihood of success.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “overcome the [strong] presumption that, under the circumstances, the challenged action might be considered sound trial strategy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.