Dewitt v. Corizon, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
760 F.3d 654 · 2014
Citation profile
18
cited by 18 later decisions
January 2025
most recently cited
9 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1988
Relies on McNeil v. United States · Pruitt v. Mote · Greeno v. Daley · Kalis v. Colgate-Palmolive Co. · Santiago v. Walls
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Though the district court need not address every point raised in recruitment motions, it must address those that bear directly on whether 'the difficulty of the case-factually and legally-exceeds the particular plaintiff's capacity as a layperson to coherently present it to the judge or jury himself.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. James v. Eli · McCaa v. Hamilton“competency may not have been entirely his own ... courts must 'specifically examine[ ]' a plaintiff's 'personal ability to litigate the case, versus the ability of the”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. McCaa v. Hamilton · Walker v. Price“as a blind and indigent prisoner with a tenth-grade education and no legal experience, faced in being able to investigate crucial facts and depose witnesses, doctors, and other allegedly resistant prison personnel.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Pennewell v. Parish
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.