United States v. McLaughlin’s Empirical Analysis
760 F.3d 699 · 2014
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2252A (§ 101 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 2253 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3571
Relies on Gall v. United States · United States v. Olano · Rita v. United States · Kimbrough v. United States · Sells v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“does not change the statutory sentencing scheme, the applicable sentencing guidelines, or the binding precedent about § 2G2.2 in this Circuit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“report does not render the non-production child pornography guidelines in § 2G2.2 invalid or illegitimate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Congress and the Commission are responsible for altering the Guidelines,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.