Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

760 F.3d 918

Docket No. 08-99003.

Wood v. Ryan

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided July 18, 2014.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 2014-07-18

2 counsel of record

Relies on Felker v. Turpin

Decided 2014-07-18

¶1Julie Hall, Oracle, AZ, Kevin Clarence Lerch, Tucson, AZ, Dale A. Baich, Esquire, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Jennifer Yolanda Garcia, Esquire, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Phoenix, AZ, for Petitioner-Appellant.

¶2Kent Ernest Cattani, Chief Counsel, John Pressley Todd, Esquire, Assistant Attorney General, Jeffrey A. Zick, Esquire, Assistant Attorney General, Phoenix, AZ, Amy Pignatella Cain, Assistant *919Attorney General, Tucson, AZ, for Respondent-Appellee.

¶3Before: SIDNEY R. THOMAS, RONALD M. GOULD, and JAY S. BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

¶4ORDER

¶5Petitioner filed a Consolidated Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Motion for Stay of Execution before the Honorable Kim W. Wardlaw. Circuit Judge Wardlaw referred the Petition and Motion to this panel pursuant to Cir. R. 22-2(c) (“Once a case is assigned to a death penalty panel, the panel will handle all matters pertaining to the case_”) and Cir. R. 22-4(e) (“In all capital cases where petitioner seeks a stay of execution, the Clerk shall refer any motion for a stay of execution to the death penalty panel.”).

¶6Under Fed. R.App. P. 22(a), “[a]n application for a writ of habeas corpus must be made to the appropriate district court.” See also Felker v. Turpin, 518 U.S. 651, 660-61, 116 S.Ct. 2833, 135 L.Ed.2d 827 (1996) (noting that the Rule would “bar consideration of original habeas petitions in the courts of appeal”). Pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 22(a), if a habeas petition is filed in the Court of Appeals, “the application must be transferred to the appropriate district court.”

¶7Therefore, the Consolidated Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus and Motion for a Stay of Execution is transferred to the District of Arizona.

¶8TRANSFERRED.

/760/f3d/918 · .json · Public domain