Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 760 P2D 1046 - Mudge v. State

Mudge v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 1991
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Hernandez · Galauska v. State · Bowell v. State · Shindle v. State · 14 Or. App. 361 - State v. Fitzgerald

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]n order for a supplier of cocaine to be criminally liable as an accomplice for the subsequent sale of cocaine by the person supplied, the state only need[s] to establish that the supplier was aware of the buyer’s plan to resell cocaine and acted with the intent to promote the buyer’s plan.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(b) Except as otherwise provided by a provision of law defining an offense, a person is not legally accountable for the conduct of another constituting an offense if [[Image here]] (2) the offense is so defined that the person’s conduct is inevitably incidental to its commission.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.