People v. Score’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 2008
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on People v. Wolfe · People v. Geller
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“• After appointment as a co-conservator, Petitioner and Mr. McDougal prepared Mr. Jones’ will and named themselves as trustees of his estate and created a ten-year trust for Mr. Jones’ sole heir, despite the fact that the heir was competent to handle his own affairs. • Petitioner took personal property from Mr. Jones’ residence. • Petitioner took a diamond ring from a safety deposit box that was part of the estate. • Petitioner intentionally excluded $32,960.55 from the original inventory in the probate court. • Petitioner and Mr. McDougal falsely informed St. Anthony’s Hospital that Mr. Jones had no medical insurance or income sufficient to pay his outstanding bill of $24,194.60. 4 • Petitioner agreed to the sale of Mr. Jones’ car to Mr. McDougal’s son without notice to Mr. Jones and for a fraction of its value. • Petitioner made inaccurate statements on the amended inventory regarding Mr. Jones’ stocks. • Petitioner and Mr. McDougal entered into a rental agreement with Mr. Jones to rent and manage one of Jones’ properties for a 10% commission.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Score v. People“The parties (in the disciplinary action) entered into a stipulation of facts and the respondent admitted that she engaged in multiple acts of misconduct with respect to her representation of Teddy Carr Jones....” People v. Score, 760 P.2d 1111 at 1112 . .In her deposition, however, Petitioner stated that she would likely become a solo practitioner. .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Score v. People
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.