Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 760 SO2D 1048 - Cooper v. Cooper

Cooper v. Cooper’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Segall v. Segall · 712 So. 2d 822 - Thomas v. Thomas · Green v. Green · 651 So. 2d 1248 - Esposito v. Esposito · 668 So. 2d 1059 - Edgar v. Edgar

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In a child support case such as this, a final judgment is deficient `in the absence of explicit factual findings concerning the actual incomes attributable to the Husband and the Wife, the amount and source of any imputed income, the probable and potential earnings level, and the adjustments to income.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “set forth findings upon which the [child support] calculation is based”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.