¶1Affirmed. See Mendelsund v. Southern-Aire Coats of Florida, Inc., 210 So.2d 229, 231 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968) (“Generally, there is a presumption that an attorney, as an officer of the court, is duly authorized to act for a client whom he professes to represent. In the absence of some pleading questioning the attorney’s acts ..., the presumption is conclusive.”).
760 So. 2d 1093
Brooks v. Shore
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided June 28, 2000
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2000-06-28
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 2004
1 state decisions
Relies on 210 So. 2d 229 - Mendelsund v. Southern-Aire Coats of Florida, Inc.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2000-06-28
View the full empirical analysis of this case →