Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

760 So. 2d 146

760 So.2d 146

25 Fla.L.WeeklySupp. 484

Hodge v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 15, 2000

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 2000-06-15

Relies on 760 So. 2d 89 - Maddox v. State · 405 So. 2d 418 - Jollie v. State · 715 So. 2d 960 - Hyden v. State

Decided 2000-06-15

PER CURIAM.

¶1We have for review the decision of Hodge v. State, 718 So.2d 832 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), in which the Fourth District Court of Appeal cited as controlling authority its decision in Hyden v. State, 715 So.2d 960 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), approved sub nom. Maddox v. State, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla.2000). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418, 420 (Fla.1981). We recently determined in Maddox that unpreserved errors in the assessment of costs cannot be raised on direct appeal as fundamental error. Accordingly, we approve the decision below.

¶2It is so ordered.

HARDING, C.J., and SHAW, WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
/760/so2d/146 · .json · Public domain