Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

760 So. 2d 149

760 So.2d 149

25 Fla.L.WeeklySupp. 482

Engeseth v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 15, 2000

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 2000-06-15

Relies on 760 So. 2d 89 - Maddox v. State · Pettway v. State

Decided 2000-06-15

PER CURIAM.

¶1We have for review a decision of the First District Court of Appeal certifying the following question to be one of great public importance:

DOES THE FAILURE OF THE TRIAL COURT TO ORALLY PRONOUNCE EACH STATUTORILY AUTHORIZED COST INDIVIDUALLY AT THE TIME OF SENTENCING CONSTITUTE FUNDAMENTAL ERROR?

¶2Engeseth v. State, 725 So.2d 428 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. For the reasons expressed in our opinion in Maddox v. State, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla.2000), we answer the certified question in the negative. We approve the decision below and find that the unpreserved sentencing errors asserted in this case do not constitute fundamental error.

¶3It is so ordered.

HARDING, C.J., and SHAW, WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ„ concur.
/760/so2d/149 · .json · Public domain