State v. Cure’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Florida Bar re Amendments to the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar · 660 So. 2d 711 - Rivera v. Bundschuh · 482 So. 2d 388 - State v. Collins · 545 So. 2d 392 - Madrigal v. State · 682 So. 2d 536 - Franquiz v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the state may [not] interfere with or challenge an exercise of the trial court's sentencing discretion not to enforce [a sentencing agreement].”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Jordan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.