Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 760 SO2D 279 - Hurtado v. State

Hurtado v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Heggs v. State · 758 So. 2d 667 - Salters v. State · Bowman v. United States · United States v. Salinas · 741 So. 2d 1190 - Evans v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The trial court made no finding that appellant’s request was made in bad faith or for purposes of delay, that the State’s case would suffer prejudice, or that the court’s schedule would not permit a continuance. The record does not support a conclusion that any of these scenarios existed and, even if it did, the trial court should have given appellant the option to proceed to trial with current counsel or discharge counsel and represent himself.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.