Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

760 So. 2d 632

760 So.2d 632

99 La.App.1Cir. 1675

State v. Cline

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 11, 2000

Louisiana Court of Appeal · decided 2000-05-11

Decided 2000-05-11

11 GUIDRY, J’.,

¶1dissenting.

¶2I disagree with the majority opinion in this matter. The evidence introduced by the State consisted solely of Sergeant Boucher’s testimony to prove the"truth of the statements that acts constituting elements of the theft actually occurred in East Baton Rouge Parish. The trial court erred in allowing hearsay evidence to be introduced at the hearing on the motion to quash. The testimony at the hearing consisted of hearsay, not admissible under any hearsay exception.

¶3Therefore, I respectfully dissent.

/760/so2d/632 · .json · Public domain