King v. King’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
August 2016
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 639 So. 2d 921 - Ferguson v. Ferguson · 639 So. 2d 909 - Hemsley v. Hemsley · Culbreath v. Johnson · 435 So. 2d 683 - Cotton v. McConnell · 642 So. 2d 901 - Carrow v. Carrow
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[p]roperty division should be based upon a determination of fair market value of the assets, and these valuations should be the initial step before determining division.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“If the marital assets, after equitable division and in light of the parties' non-marital assets, will adequately provide for both parties, then `no more need be done.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“brought into the marriage by one partner and used by the family becomes a marital asset, losing its identity as a separate estate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.