Randall v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
June 2017
most recently cited
18 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 110 So. 2d 654 - Williams v. State · 616 So. 2d 1 - State v. Johnson · Straight v. State · 513 So. 2d 122 - State v. Fundora · 493 So. 2d 1019 - Wilson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“For an error to be so fundamental that it can be raised for the first time on appeal, the error must be basic to the judicial decision under review and equivalent to a denial of due process.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Where the State's proof fails to exclude a reasonable hypothesis that the homicide [or an attempt] occurred other than by premeditated design, a verdict of first-degree murder cannot be sustained.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bell v. State“Randall intended for his choking behavior to lead only to sexual gratification, not to the deaths of his sexual partners,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.