Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

760 So. 2d 975

Sullivan v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2000-05-12

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 2013

1 state decisions

Relies on 732 So. 2d 17 - Speed v. State · State v. Maples

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-05-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Following Speed v. State, 732 So.2d 17 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999), and its progeny, we reject the appellant’s argument that the Prisoner Release Reoffender Act (PRRA) is unconstitutional.

¶2The state cross-appealed a sentencing issue alleging that appellant’s thirty year sentence imposed for the offense of robbery with a firearm, a first degree felony punishable by a term of years not exceeding life, should have been enhanced under the PRRA to a life sentence. The decision in State v. Maples, 739 So.2d 127 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999) requires enhancement and the cause is remanded for imposition of a life sentence.

¶3SENTENCE VACATED IN PART; REMANDED.

COBB, PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.
/760/so2d/975 · .json · Public domain