Wright-El v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently April 2005
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Faretta v. California · Alonzo Bailey v. State of Alabama · Sanders v. State · Moore v. Blackburn, Warden · State v. Gilmore
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he absence or inclusion of a middle name does not defeat the prima facie case since a middle name has little, if any, legal significance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Johnson“[t]he identity of first and last names alone authorized a finding by the trial court that defendant was the person previously convicted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Johnson“Appellant, by [her] own words, bolsters the [S]tate's claim by admitting [s]he is a prior offender....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Johnson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.