Ham v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 1992
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Agurs · Ahumada v. United States · Quinones v. State · Means v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Id.; Ham v. State, 760 S.W.2d 55, 58 (Tex.App.Amarillo 1988, no pet.). The mere possibility that the evidence might help the defense or otherwise affect the outcome of the trial does not establish its materiality in the sense necessary to merit reversal of the conviction; rather, when evaluated in the context of the entire record, the evidence must be such that disclosure would have”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Washington v. State“create[d] a reasonable doubt about the defendant's guilt that did not otherwise exist.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Washington v. State“may have had an effect on the outcome of the trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Washington v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.