State v. Garner’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently June 2004
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Edwards v. Arizona · Jackson v. Denno · Sullivan v. United States · Sims v. State of Georgia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the new judge, upon making the factual findings necessary to resolve the issue of admissibility, rules that appellant’s written and videotape confessions are admissible, the new judge shall sentence appellant in accordance with the verdict and enter judgment accordingly. Appellant can then appeal anew, but such appeal shall be confined to the issues raised by appellant’s first point 1 in the instant appeal, as we have already rejected appellant’s second point and all other allegations of error in appellant’s motion for new trial have been abandoned.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Garner“`Acts or conduct [that] give the appearance of partiality should be avoided with the same degree of zeal as acts or conduct [that] inexorably bespeak partiality.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re KLW
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.