Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 761 A2D 207 - Heicklen v. Hoffman

Heicklen v. Hoffman’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Stickel v. Ohio Casualty Co. · 313 Pa. Super. 332 - Praisner v. Stocker · 360 Pa. Super. 539 - Feingold v. Hill · 140 Pa. Commw. 389 - Faust v. Com., Dept. of Revenue

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The nine exceptions to sovereign immunity, as provided by [ Section 8522(b) of the Judicial Code ], are: (1) vehicle liability; (2) medical-professional liability; (3) care, custody or control of personal property; (4) Commonwealth real estate, highways and sidewalks; (5) potholes and other dangerous conditions; (6) care, custody and control of animals; (7) liquor store sales; (8) National Guard activities; and (9) toxoids and vaccines.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[I]t is hereby declared to be the intent of the General Assembly that the Commonwealth, and its officials and employees acting within the scope of their duties, shall continue to enjoy sovereign immunity and official immunity and remain immune from suit except as the General Assembly shall specifically waive the immunity .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.