United States v. Woosley’s Empirical Analysis
761 F.2d 445 · 1985
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently June 2017
17 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 8 U.S.C. § 1324 (§ 274 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Wingo v. Wedding · Ruckelshaus v. Sierra Club · Rich v. United States · Jacobs v. Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections · Huff v. White Motor Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The district court has considerable discretion in admitting evidence of acts of subsequent conduct of a defendant offered to prove the absence of evil intent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“prohibit the [defendant] from introducing evidence not disclosed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“prejudicial to the substantial rights of the defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.