Crofoot v. United States Government Printing Office’s Empirical Analysis
761 F.2d 661 · 1985
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently May 2009 · most notably United States v. Tunning (1995), Sanders v. United States Postal Service (1986)
10 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 7513 · 5 U.S.C. § 7703
Relies on North Carolina v. Alford · Hayes v. Department of the Navy · Bruce v. United States · Gueory v. Hampton · Charles H. Young v. Robert E. Hampton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a conviction pursuant to a nolo contendere plea gives rise to a variety of collateral consequences in subsequent proceedings.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“a conviction on a plea of guilty under the Alford doctrine may, in the Board's discretion, be considered as the basis for the employee's removal.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“for such cause as will promote the efficiency of the service.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.