Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 761 F.2d 827 - Brasslett v. Cota

Brasslett v. Cota’s Empirical Analysis

761 F.2d 827 · 1985

Citation profile

163
cited by 163 later decisions
19
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

65 federal appellate · 37 district · 33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 163 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably Conaway v. Smith (1988), O'Connor v. Steeves (1993)

65 federal appellate · 37 district · 33 state decisions — followed in 19 states

7301985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988 · 5 U.S.C. § 7501 (Civil Service Due Process Amendments)

Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · New York Times Co. v. Sullivan · Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle · Pickering v. Board of Education of Township High School District 205 Will County Illinois · Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 163 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an employer has a greater interest in curtailing erroneous statements than correct ones, and still a greater interest in curtailing deliberate falsehoods,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “... need not be elaborate. The specific procedural requirements are to be deter mined with reference to the interests involved and the availability and extent of post-termination review. When a discharged employee may receive a post-termination hearing to review adverse personnel actions, the pre-termination hearing need only be extensive enough to guard against mistaken decisions. Accordingly, a ‘tenured employee is entitled to oral or written notice of the charges against him, an explanation of the employer’s evidence, and an opportunity to present his side of the story.’”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “In his one hour conference with Manager Cota, Brasslett was notified of the possibility of discharge and was afforded an ample opportunity to defend his actions and rebut any erroneous allegations.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.