Sugiarto v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
761 F.3d 102 · 2014
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229A (§ 240 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Raza v. Gonzales · Ang v. Gonzales · Guerrero-Santana v. Gonzales · Sugiarto v. Holder · Fen Tjong Lie v. Holder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is enough if the agency fairly considers the points raised by the complainant and articulates its decision in terms adequate to allow a reviewing court to conclude that the agency has thought about the evidence and the issues and reached a reasoned conclusion.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a persistent problem rather than a recent change.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“to conclude that [the evidence] demonstrates the continuation”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Tulung v. Garland
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.