Smith v. Mylan Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
761 F.3d 1042 · 2014
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1446 · 28 U.S.C. § 1447
Relies on Fristoe v. Reynolds Metals Co. · Barnes v. Westinghouse Electric Corp. · Maniar v. Federal Deposit Insurance · Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Company · Kelton Arms Condominium Owners Ass'n v. Homestead Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although the [thirty-day] time limit is mandatory and a timely objection to a late petition will defeat removal, a party may waive the defect or be estopped from objecting to the untimeliness by sitting on his rights.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“untimely removal is a procedural defect and not jurisdictional, and that § 1447(c) limits a district court's power to remand a case sua sponte for such a procedural defect”). Because the Court”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[ Section] 1446(b) 's thirty-day time limit within which the defendant must file a notice of removal after receipt of the complaint ... [is] merely procedural.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.