Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 761 F.3d 443 - United States v. Fields

United States v. Fields’s Empirical Analysis

761 F.3d 443 · 2014

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
April 2025
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3600 (Innocence Protection Act of 2004) · 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Slack v. McDaniel · Miller-El v. Cockrell Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division · Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Williams v. Taylor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[O]ur caselaw does not recognize freestanding actual innocence claims.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “reopen the [§] 2255 proceedings so that he [can] interview jurors 'to determine what role, if any, racial bias played in his convictions and sentences.' " The government notes, correctly, that "[a] habeas petitioner, unlike the usual civil litigant in federal court, is not entitled to discovery as a matter of ordinary course.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[a] petitioner demonstrates 'good cause' [for discovery] under Rule 6(a) [of the Rules Governing § 2255 Proceedings] 'where specific allegations before the court show reason to believe that a petitioner may, if the facts are fully developed, be able to demonstrate that he is ... entitled to relief'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.