Lightspeed Media Corp. v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
761 F.3d 699 · 2014
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 17 U.S.C. § 512 (§ 202 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1030 (Computer Fraud and Abuse Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1446 · 28 U.S.C. § 1651 · 28 U.S.C. § 1927
Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Baxter v. Palmigiano · Hicks Ex Rel. Feiock v. Feiock · United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. Espinosa · 201 Ill. 2d 403 - Robinson v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Any attorney or other person admitted to conduct cases in any court of the United States or any Territory thereof who so multiplies the proceedings in any case unreasonably and vexatiously may be required by the court to satisfy personally the excess costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees reasonably incurred because of such conduct.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.