Blackburn v. Colvin’s Empirical Analysis
761 F.3d 853 · 2014
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Sullivan v. Zebley · Prosch v. Apfel · Hacker v. Barnhart · Shontos v. Barnhart · Lacroix v. Barnhart
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To meet a listing, a claimant must show that he or she meets all of the criteria for the listed impairment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dols v. Saul“bears the burden of establishing that he meets all the criteria”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dols v. Saul
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.