Parrish v. Dayton’s Empirical Analysis
761 F.3d 873 · 2014
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 8 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner · Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National Union · Thomas v. Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co. · Texas v. United States · Ohio Forestry Association Inc v. Sierra Club
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[The ripeness doctrine’s] basic rationale is to prevent the courts, through avoidance of premature adjudication, from entangling themselves in abstract disagreements over administrative policies, and also to protect the agencies from judicial interference until an administrative decision has been formalized and its effects felt in a concrete way by the challenging parties. The problem is best seen in a twofold aspect, requiring us to evaluate both the fitness of the issues for judicial decision and the hardship to the parties of withholding court consideration.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The fitness prong safeguards against judicial review of hypothetical or speculative disagreements.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.