Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 761 F. Supp. 1100 - Glenside West Corp. v. Exxon Co., USA

761 F. Supp. 1100 - Glenside West Corp. v. Exxon Co., USA’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
1
states following
March 2014
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 37 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently March 2014 · most notably Williams v. Jader Fuel Co. (1991), North Penn Transfer, Inc. v. Victaulic Co. of America (1994)

2 federal appellate · 37 district · 1 state decisions

240199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 2801 (Petroleum Marketing Pract) · 15 U.S.C. § 2802 · 15 U.S.C. § 2803 · 15 U.S.C. § 2805 (Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 2806 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Hishon v. King & Spalding · Russello v. United States · Gomez v. Toledo · Commissioner v. Engle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(2) For purposes of this subsection, the following are grounds for termination of a franchise ... relationship: (B) A failure by the franchisee to exert good faith efforts to carry out the provisions of the franchise, if— (i) the franchisee was apprised by the franchisor in writing of such failure and was afforded a reasonable opportunity to exert good faith efforts to carry out such provisions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.