Murray v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
62
cited by 62 later decisions
5
states following
July 2019
most recently cited
62 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Richardson v. State · Gaddis v. State · Tillman v. State · Warren v. State · Wisehart v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“impinge on the jury's responsibility to judge the credibility of witnesses only when confronted with inherently improbable testimony or coerced, equivocal, wholly uncorroborated testimony of incredible dubiosity.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Govan v. State · Caruthers v. State“the sole witness presents inherently contradictory testimony. which is equivocal or the result of coercion and there is a complete lack of cireumstantial evidence of the appellant's guilt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Weis v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.