Chafin v. Grayson’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
July 2006
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Keith v. Mendus · DeVittorio v. Werker Bros., Inc. · Malacina v. Malacina · Precision Screen MacHines, Inc. v. Hixson · State v. McKenzie
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(5) In the case of excessive or inadequate damages, [the court shalll enter final judgment on the evidence for the amount of the proper damages, grant a new trial, or grant a new trial subject to additur or remittitur; Hook ook (7) In reviewing the evidence, the court shall grant a new trial if it determines that the verdict of a non-advisory jury is against the weight of the evidence; and shall enter judgment, subject to the provisions herein, if the court determines that the verdict of a non-advisory jury is clearly erroneous as contrary to or not supported by the evidence, [. ..]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Pendleton v. Aguilar
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.